Essays from the systems we lead.

On May 29, 2026, OMB proposed rewriting the rules that govern every federal grant. The comment period closes July 13. The biggest shift is not a single provision. It is the reclassification of the Uniform Guidance from administrative guidance into a binding Uniform Grants Regulation, paired with expanded agency authority to terminate awards that no longer align with agency priorities. Here is what recipients should be doing before October 1.

By the 2026-27 school year, most states require a school cell phone policy, and Missouri is on the list. Passing a policy is not the same as implementing one. The boards that get this right treat it as a governance and code-of-conduct question, not a device question: who enforces, what the graduated consequences are, how medical and IEP exceptions work, and whether the policy survives the first contested suspension. Here is the implementation framework.

Under OBBBA, the largest Medicaid reductions hit starting in 2027. Nonprofit and safety-net hospitals with a high Medicaid mix are the most exposed, and the sector is splitting into systems that will thrive, survive, and struggle. The difference is rarely clinical. It is governance: whether the board is doing the scenario planning, expense discipline, and service-line decisions in 2026 that a 2027 revenue shock requires. Here is the board agenda.

In 2026, the share of nonprofit executives naming burnout as a serious concern jumped to 46 percent, while foundation funding tightened and demand rose. Fewer than one in three boards has a written succession plan. Board-relationship breakdown is now a leading driver of executive resignations. The board cannot fix the funding climate, but it owns the two things that most determine whether its executive stays and whether the organization survives a departure: the working relationship and the succession plan. Here is the board's work.

Every board is being asked the same question: what is our AI policy? Most are answering with a vendor tool decision. That is not governance. AI governance is a board-level oversight question about risk tolerance, accountability, and the line between strategic policy and operational execution. Here is the framework.

The 2024 Title IX Final Rule was vacated nationwide by Tennessee v. Cardona in January 2025. The 2020 rule is back as the federal floor. But state laws, residual 2024-rule policies, and pending rulemaking mean hearing officers are still not working from a clean template. Here is what changed, what held, and what hearing records need to look like now.

Houston. Memphis. Providence. State takeovers are accelerating. Authorizer enforcement is sharper. Charter renewals are tougher. By the time the state monitor walks in, the governance choices that determined the outcome were made 18 months ago. Here are the five signals reviewers look for and the corrective moves to make before the spotlight arrives.

Public Act 101-0455 in Illinois and Missouri SB 68 both require threat assessment teams. The roster is the easy part. What separates a team that prevents incidents from a team that just exists is the operating rhythm: how often they meet, what data they review, and who has authority to act when the signal is real.

Healthcare boards face a unique tension: clinical complexity, regulatory pressure, and patients who are not in the room. Most healthcare boards make the same three structural mistakes. None of them are about competence. All of them are about design.

Most grant applications fail not because the program is weak but because the application does not answer the questions reviewers are scored on. After sitting on federal review panels, the pattern is clear: applicants write to the program officer. Reviewers score against the rubric. Those are two different audiences.

Missouri Senate Bill 68 requires every school to appoint a qualified safety coordinator, conduct comprehensive safety audits, and submit compliance documentation to DESE by July 1, 2026. Most schools are not ready. Here is what the law requires, what the timeline looks like, and where to start if you are behind.

Most disciplinary proceedings are handled internally. But there are moments when internal staff cannot provide the neutrality, documentation quality, or procedural rigor the situation demands. Here are five scenarios where an independent hearing officer protects the organization, the individual, and the integrity of the process.

Most leadership transitions fail in the first 90 days, not the first 90 weeks. The departing leader is celebrated. The incoming leader is welcomed. Then the staff realizes nothing about how decisions get made has actually changed, and the strategic priorities the previous leader set are still pulling the organization in directions the new leader did not choose.

A board that meets every month is not necessarily a board that governs. Governance requires decision-making, oversight, strategic questioning, and accountability. Most boards default to reporting: staff presents, board listens, meeting adjourns. Here is how to tell which kind of board you have, and how to close the gap.

Most organizations treat change management as a communication plan: draft the memo, schedule the town hall, update the org chart. That is not change management. Real change management is the architecture of how people, structure, and process realign when the organization decides to operate differently. Here is what it looks like in practice.

Boards revise policies. Staff carry them out. That is the theory. In practice, most policy revisions die in the gap between adoption and execution. The board signs off, the policy moves to the binder, and the operational reality continues as before. Here is what the implementation layer needs to include for a revised policy to actually change behavior.

Strategic plans fail for predictable reasons. They are written by people who will not implement them. They lack owners, deadlines, and accountability. They assume the politics will hold. They sit in a binder. Here are the five failure modes we see most often, and the structural changes that make plans survive.

The instinct after a serious incident is to rewrite the handbook. It's the wrong first move. Here are three diagnostic moves that tell you whether the handbook is actually the problem, and what probably is.

Research is consistent: schools over-invest in discipline and under-invest in prevention. The Restorative Safety Framework is a four-layer systems model that addresses this imbalance, and the three layers most districts neglect.

A pattern keeps repeating in schools and agencies: an incident happens, a policy tightens, consequences escalate, and the same problem returns. Here is why punishment-first systems stall, and what actually changes behavior over time.